MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408289760 · doi:10.1094/mpmi-12-24-0159-fi

Transcriptional Profiling and Genetic Mapping of Barley Responses to Bacterial Flagellin

2025· article· en· W4408289760 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Elizabeth K. Brauer, Whynn Bosnich, Monique Power, Doris Luckert, S. K. Khanal, Nathan Liang, Moatter Syed, Martin Charette, Danielle Wolfe, Arezo Pattang, Hannah Morrison, Stephanie Poncos, James R. Tucker, Raja Khanal, Jean‐Sébastien Parent, Bahram Samanfar

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsFlagellinBiologyArabidopsisGeneGeneticsMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diverse plant species detect bacterial flagellin using leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases to activate defense responses and promote resistance against bacterial invasion. In barley, the impact of flagellin on inducible defense responses has not been fully described. Here, we report that the flagellin-derived flg22 peptide induces callose, reactive oxygen species (ROS) bursts, and differential expression of 2,603 genes in barley. Cultivated barley genotypes produce different amplitudes of flg22-induced ROS bursts, indicating genetic variation for microbe-associated molecular pattern responses. Association mapping revealed a region on chromosome 7 underlying variation in flg22-induced ROS bursts, which contains 12 flg22-induced genes. Genotypes with higher flg22 responses had higher induced resistance to Xanthomonas translucens pv. translucens ( Xtt), the causal organism of bacterial leaf streak. The flg22 region of Xtt flagellin evades detection in both barley and Arabidopsis, and a single amino acid change can restore immunogenicity of the peptide. Together, this work underlines the effectiveness of the flagellin-triggered defenses in promoting barley resistance to Xtt, which evades recognition of the flg22 region in its host. [Formula: see text]Copyright © 2025 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant-Microbe InteractionsSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207