MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408291138 · doi:10.59671/zo0ox

Optimizing Pulp Protection : A Systematic Review of Pulp capping agents and their Properties

2025· review· en· W4408291138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterciencia · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulp (tooth)Pulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceBiochemical engineeringEngineeringMedicineDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulp capping materials posses a vital role in in maintain structural integrity of tooth. Ca++/OHrelease which often play a pivotal role are often ignored. To ensure all the properties are given equal importance, this systematic review was conducted to select the pulp capping agent which fulfils all the properties required for a successful clinical outcome.This review insights common clinician for selecting a material during deep carious management.The aim of this review is to select the best pulp capping material that satisfies all the requirements of physical, chemical and biological properties that are beneficial for pulp therapy.Protocol was formulated in accordance with PRISMA checklist 2020 and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020160461). Electronic search from databases such as Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were performed from the year 2008– 2023. In Vitro studies that evaluated chemical, physical, mechanical and biological properties of pulp capping agents were included. A total of 15 studies were included in the systematic review. After assessing the risk of bias using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, data was compiled of the included studies. A total of 3038 articles were retrieved from selected databases and out of which 15 studies were included in this review. Based on the risk of bias assessment 2 studies were of very good quality, 5 studies of good quality and 8 studies were of satisfactory quality. Among the pulp capping agents, Tech Biosealer capping, MTA Plus gel and Biodentine exhibited high values of Calcium ion release both at short (3 days) and long-time interval (28 days) whereas Lime-Lite released least amount of Calcium ions. Biodentine had the highest compressive strength and is most cytocompatible. This review leads to the conclusion that calcium silicate-based materials demonstrate superior chemical, physico-mechanical and biological properties, closely aligning with the desirable attributes for pulp therapy. Out of the Calcium silicate-based materials Biodentine exhibits properties that are best for pulpal healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it