<scp>Proteoform-predictor</scp>: Increasing the Phylogenetic Reach of Top-Down Proteomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteoforms are distinct molecular forms of proteins that act as building blocks of organisms, with post-translational modifications (PTMs) being one of the key changes that generate these variations. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based top-down proteomics (TDP) is the leading technology for proteoform identification due to its preservation of intact proteoforms for analysis, making it well-suited for comprehensive PTM characterization. A crucial step in TDP is searching MS data against a database of candidate proteoforms. To extend the reach of TDP to organisms with limited PTM annotations, we developed Proteoform-predictor, an open-source tool that integrates homology-based PTM site prediction into proteoform database creation. The new tool creates databases of proteoform candidates after registration of homologous sequences, transferring PTM sites from well-characterized species to those with less comprehensive proteomic data. Our tool features a user-friendly interface and intuitive workflow, making it accessible to a wide range of researchers. We demonstrate that Proteoform-predictor expands proteoform databases with tens of thousands of proteoforms for three bacterial strains by comparing them to the reference proteome of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) K12. Subsequent TDP analysis for Serratia marcescens ( S. marcescens ) and Salmonella typhimurium ( S. typhimurium ) demonstrated significant improvement in protein and proteoform identification, even for proteins with variant sequences. As TDP technology advances, Proteoform-predictor will become an important tool for expanding the applicability of proteoform identification and PTM biology to more diverse species across the phylogenetic tree of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".