MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408291802 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00943

<scp>Proteoform-predictor</scp>: Increasing the Phylogenetic Reach of Top-Down Proteomics

2025· article· en· W4408291802 on OpenAlexaff
Taojunfeng Su, Ryan T. Fellers, Joseph B. Greer, Richard D. LeDuc, Paul M. Thomas, Neil L. Kelleher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
FundersNational Cancer InstituteDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer InstituteNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNorthwestern University
KeywordsProteomicsComputational biologyBiologyBioinformaticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteoforms are distinct molecular forms of proteins that act as building blocks of organisms, with post-translational modifications (PTMs) being one of the key changes that generate these variations. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based top-down proteomics (TDP) is the leading technology for proteoform identification due to its preservation of intact proteoforms for analysis, making it well-suited for comprehensive PTM characterization. A crucial step in TDP is searching MS data against a database of candidate proteoforms. To extend the reach of TDP to organisms with limited PTM annotations, we developed Proteoform-predictor, an open-source tool that integrates homology-based PTM site prediction into proteoform database creation. The new tool creates databases of proteoform candidates after registration of homologous sequences, transferring PTM sites from well-characterized species to those with less comprehensive proteomic data. Our tool features a user-friendly interface and intuitive workflow, making it accessible to a wide range of researchers. We demonstrate that Proteoform-predictor expands proteoform databases with tens of thousands of proteoforms for three bacterial strains by comparing them to the reference proteome of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) K12. Subsequent TDP analysis for Serratia marcescens ( S. marcescens ) and Salmonella typhimurium ( S. typhimurium ) demonstrated significant improvement in protein and proteoform identification, even for proteins with variant sequences. As TDP technology advances, Proteoform-predictor will become an important tool for expanding the applicability of proteoform identification and PTM biology to more diverse species across the phylogenetic tree of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207