Orientation of Conjugated Polymers in Single Crystals: Is It Really Unusual for the Polydiacetylene Backbone to Be Aligned Almost Perpendicular to the Hydrogen Bond Network?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the topochemical solid-state polymerization of different series of symmetrical diacetylenes (DAs) and asymmetrical chlorodiacetylenes (ClDAs), whose members differ in their alkyl spacing lengths of one to four methylene units (n = 1, 2, 3, 4) between the diyne and carbamate functionalities. Structure determination by single-crystal X-Ray diffraction (SCXRD) confirms that in each of these series, at least 50% of the analyses show monomers with a particular stacking pattern presenting two potential directions of polymerization simultaneously. An organization of a crystalline polydiacetylene (PDA) with an oblique chain orientation with respect to the network of cooperatives hydrogen bonds is rather rare in the literature (only two cases), and here we have obtained two more examples of this type of structural motif (supported by SCXRD analysis of the polymer). Orientation control is essential to optimize the performance of conjugated polymers, and a spacer length modification strategy presents a potential way to achieve this in the case of PDA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".