A surface charge approach to characterize serpentine reactivity for carbon mineralization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antigorite, lizardite and chrysotile are serpentine minerals that act as Mg 2+ donors during carbon mineralization involving ultramafic rocks and tailings. The reactivity of these minerals is measured by the total amount of Mg 2+ that can be leached under appropriate time and conditions for the proposed carbon mineralization technology. Their dissolution processes were examined under ambient conditions to elucidate the sources and mechanisms of Mg 2+ release. Results from dissolution experiments and zeta potential measurements are reported here. Prior to leaching, all three serpentine polymorphs exhibited highly alkaline IEPs at approximately pH 11.9 and higher, which correlated with their high Mg 2+ to Si 4+ ratios (i.e., Mg/Si ratio). As dissolution proceeded, a decrease in both zeta potential values and Mg/Si ratio was observed, reflecting the non-stoichiometric dissolution of the serpentines and highlighting polymorph-specific variations. Post-leaching IEP measurements revealed that the degree of surface alteration is closely linked to changes in zeta potential. The following order of increasing carbon mineralization reactivity is established: antigorite < lizardite < non-asbestiform chrysotile < asbestiform chrysotile. Among the polymorphs, antigorite, which released the least Mg 2+ , showed the most significant reduction in zeta potential and a shift to an acidic IEP around pH 5. In contrast, asbestiform chrysotile, with the highest Mg 2+ release, exhibited lower zeta potential reduction while maintaining an alkaline IEP near pH 9. Non-asbestiform chrysotile leached less Mg 2+ and showed moderate zeta potential reduction. This is followed by lizardite, which released even less Mg 2+ , retained an alkaline IEP around pH 11 and demonstrated uniform dissolution with only a slight decrease in zeta potential. These observations suggest that early-stage Mg 2+ leaching from serpentine is predominantly a surface process that significantly influences the electrokinetic behaviour of the minerals. Higher Mg 2+ release does not correlate with increased solubility, as the Mg 2+ ions are not derived from bulk dissolution. The lack of a 1:1 relationship between Mg 2+ leaching and net change in zeta potential emphasizes the distinct electrokinetic and surface dissolution behaviours among serpentine polymorphs. The findings from zeta potential analysis offer valuable insights into the reactivity contribution of serpentine minerals during carbon mineralization involving ultramafic-type feedstocks. • Accurate reactivity characterization of serpentine minerals is crucial for CCS and CDR approaches using ultramafic-type feedstocks. • Carbon mineralization reactivity of serpentine is primarily sourced from surface dissolution rather than bulk dissolution. • Zeta potential provides insight into Mg 2+ /Si 4+ composition, degree of surface alteration, and polymorphic variation of serpentine. • IEP shift and reductions demonstrate the effect of serpentine morphologies on its surface dissolution characteristics. • Variations in zeta potential shape and width indicate greater dissolution in finer particles compared to coarser ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".