MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408304092 · doi:10.1002/9781394174980.ch8

Terraforming Mars with Microalgae, Especially Diatoms

2025· other· en· W4408304092 on OpenAlexaff
Ira Rai, Jackson Achankunju, Richard Gordon, Vandana Vinayak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramEnvironmental scienceAstrobiologyDiatomOceanographyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last century, the space age was initiated, fueled by numerous efforts to extend our knowledge beyond the solar system and our existence beyond Earth. Since the seventies, many telescopes covering a wide range of electromagnetic radiation, space and planet probes, satellites, and crewed orbital missions have been launched, while humans seek to reach and colonize a planet like Mars. Therefore, a crew's survival on a spaceship during long-term missions has become a critical issue requiring extensive research and innovations. Diatoms, the most abundant silica-walled microalgae, are considered the most successful primary producers on Earth, with an extraordinary diversity responsible for 25% of net primary production fixing 10 13 kg carbon every year. Further, the psychrophilic nature of diatoms makes their adaptability to survive in an ice cold environment well supportive for their survival and a possible life in planet like Mars. Since Mars has a thin atmospheric layer consisting of a pressure of 6–7 mbar, 95%CO 2 , 2.8%N 2 , 2.1%Ar with only 0.13% O 2 compared to 21% O 2 , 78%N 2 , 0.04% CO 2 and ~1000 mBar of atmospheric pressure on Earth it has bright possibility of terraforming Mars into planet suitable for life. Therefore, in this chapter we discuss the prospects of simulating life on Mars, which has a bright microalgae of the greatest potential, i.e diatoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207