MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408312192 · doi:10.1002/pen.27129

A coupled level set‐arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method applied to numerical simulation of parison pinch‐off in extrusion‐blow molding

2025· article· en· W4408312192 on OpenAlexaff
Kalonji K. Kabanemi, Jean‐Philippe Marcotte, F. Ilinca, Yohann Vautrin

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlow moldingExtrusionMaterials scienceMolding (decorative)Eulerian pathPinchLagrangianMechanicsSet (abstract data type)Computer simulationMechanical engineeringMathematicsComposite materialMathematical analysisPhysicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An outstanding problem in extrusion blow‐molding process of polymers is the precise prediction of the parison shape inside the part along the pinch‐off weld. Such a prediction is highly relevant for producing components with an accurate wall thickness distribution along the parting line as blow‐molded parts often fail at the parison pinch‐off weld of the mold parting line. In this paper, we report on the numerical study of the parison pinch‐off modeling in extrusion‐blow molding using a coupled level set (LS)‐arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method. The deformation of the parison‐free surface during the mold closing stage is approximated by means of the level set technique on a deforming mesh domain caused by the simultaneous mold halves displacement. The multi‐mode Phan‐Thien and Tanner (mPTT) constitutive equation is employed to model the parison deformation in the pressure zone, the flash pocket, and along the pinching edge. The developed LS–ALE approach is first validated on a benchmark squeeze flow problem between two parallel coaxial disks for both Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids before the numerical simulation results for the pinch‐off problem are discussed. We report numerical experiments related to the mold closing velocity effects on the parison shape behavior and parison wall thickness distribution along the pinch‐off weld for a high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). For this viscoelastic polymer, the parison exhibits a rounded shape along the pinch‐off weld line inside the part, and this rounding becomes more pronounced as the mold closing velocity increases, in accordance with experimental observations. Whereas, for a Newtonian fluid, the parison displays an angular V‐shape along the pinch‐off weld inside the part and does not depend on the mold closing speed. The parison thickness along the weld line is increased by 126% for the HDPE studied while it only increases by 72% for a Newtonian fluid with the same zero shear‐rate viscosity. The predicted parison wall thickness distribution around the pinching zone represents an important step in optimizing both processing conditions and the mold pinch‐off design. Highlights A coupled LS–ALE method was developed to simulate parison pinch‐off. The method successfully validated on squeeze flow for Oldroyd‐B fluid. Viscoelastic fluids exhibit a rounded shape at pinch‐off weld inside part. Newtonian fluids exhibit a V‐shape along pinch‐off weld inside part. Material rounded shape inside part increases with mold closing speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Engineering and ScienceSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207