MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408328840 · doi:10.59338/cmj.32

Correlation Between Radiographic Grading and Severity of Symptoms in Osteoarthritis of the Knee

2024· article· en· W4408328840 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Himal Khanal, Pawan Marasini, Kiran Prasad Rijal, Sarita Shrestha

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil Medical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisRadiographyGrading (engineering)MedicineCorrelationOrthodonticsRadiologyPhysical therapyPathologyMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoarthritis is by far the most common form of joint disease throughout the world. Knee osteoarthritis is an important contributor for global disability among the geriatric population. There are conflicting reports regarding radiological severity and clinical findings among patients. The aim of this study was to find the relation between radiographic features and severity of symptoms in knee osteoarthritis. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Sinamangal, Kathmandu. A total of 174 patients with osteoarthritis knee who presented from January 2019 to June 2020 were included in the study. The diagnosis of knee OA was based on American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR) for knee OA. Demographic variables including age, sex, occupation and BMI were recorded. The severity of symptoms was evaluated using WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and radiographic features were evaluated using K-L grading. Correlation between WOMAC score and K-L grading was assessed for the knee OA. Results: Out of 174 patients (one hundred and thirty-three female and forty-one male) the mean age was 60.30±8.329 years (range: 50 to 94 years). Majority of our patients were housewives (37.9%) followed by farmers (32.2%). The average BMI of patients in our study was 27.40 (SD 2.41). Based on Kellgren Lawrence (K-L) grading, 13.2% patients had K-L grade I on X-ray of knee, 34.5% had K-L grade II, 35.1% had K-L grade III and 17.2% had K-L grade IV. The mean WOMAC score in our study was 43.99(Range; 24- 71). K-L grades were strongly correlated with WOMAC scores and sub-scores in our study with spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) +0.784. Conclusion: Radiographic findings and severity of clinical symptoms were positively correlated. Knee pain, stiffness and limitation of function due to OA knee is strongly correlated with X-ray changes. Both clinical symptoms and radiographic findings should be considered when treating patients with knee OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil Medical Journal→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→