MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408348547 · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.03.007

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Pedal Acceleration Time to Identify Peripheral Artery Disease

2025· article· en· W4408348547 on OpenAlexaff
Jill Sommerset, Desarom Teso, Joseph L. Mills, Mathew Sebastian, Ahmed Kayssi, Sarah Leask, Richard Rounsley, Peta Ellen Tehan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArterial diseasePeripheralAccelerationTest (biology)Acceleration timeSurgeryInternal medicineVascular disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Pedal acceleration time (PAT) is a novel method of using diagnostic ultrasound to evaluate the haemodynamic characteristics of pedal arteries and has potential as an adjunctive vascular testing method. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PAT in identifying peripheral artery disease (PAD) in a population with clinically suspected PAD. METHODS: This was a multicentre cross sectional study to estimate the diagnostic test accuracy. Participants with clinically suspected PAD were recruited via consecutive sampling at four centres. Colour duplex ultrasound (reference standard) and toe brachial index (TBI) were measured by a vascular sonographer. A second vascular sonographer, blinded to all other measures, conducted the PAT measurements on the same limb. PAD was defined as a > 50% stenosis in any vessel from the distal aorta to the foot. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were estimated for all PAT values. Receiver operating characteristic curves were also generated. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight participants (227 limbs) were recruited, with a mean age of 71 years (standard deviation 10, range 43 - 93) with 56 women (29.8%) including 133 (70.7) limbs having PAD (59%) and 61 (32.4%) claudicants. Area under the curve for PAT: lateral plantar artery 0.72 (0.65 - 0.79), medial plantar artery 0.72 (0.65 - 0.79), dorsal metatarsal artery 0.77 (0.70 - 0.84), arcuate artery 0.71 (0.64 - 0.78), and deep plantar artery 0.73 (0.67 - 0.80). Utilising the worst case PAT measure for the limb for identifying PAD had an AUC of 0.79 (0.74 - 0.85) and positive and negative predictive values of 0.81 (0.57 - 0.89) and 0.66 (0.57 - 0.75), respectively. Area under the curve for the toe brachial index was 0.78 (0.71 - 0.85) and that of ankle brachial index was 0.70 (0.62 - 0.77). CONCLUSION: PAT had an acceptable diagnostic test accuracy as an assessment tool to identify PAD in a population with clinically suspected PAD. All five measures yielded similar accuracy to toe pressure and TBI; however, using the worst case PAT value yielded the highest diagnostic test accuracy of all PAT measures. The PAT diagnostic threshold for the presence of PAD may be revised to > 85 ms to optimise the performance of the test for the identification of PAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgerySame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207