MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408358274 · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.033108

Measurements of diffusion coefficients for rubidium–inert-gas mixtures using coherent scattering from optically pumped population gratings

2025· article· en· W4408358274 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander Pouliot, Eduardo Ramos, Gehrig Carlse, Thomas Vacheresse, Jaskaran Randhawa, L. Marmet, A. Kumarakrishnan, Jacek Kłos, Eite Tiesinga

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsRubidiumDiffusionMaterials scienceScatteringInert gasPopulationOpticsAtomic physicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present comprehensive determinations of the diffusion coefficients $D$ at $T=24\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}\mathrm{C}$ for trace amounts of naturally abundant Rb atoms in inert, naturally abundant He, Ne, ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$, Ar, Kr, and Xe buffer gases using a single measurement technique. They have been measured by establishing a spatially periodic population grating in the Rb sample using two laser beams that intersect at a small angle $\ensuremath{\theta}$ of a few milliradians. The atomic population grating decays exponentially in time due to diffusive motion induced by momentum-changing elastic collisions between Rb and buffer gas atoms or molecules. This decay is monitored by observing the scattered field from a readout beam aligned along the direction of one of the excitation beams. We distinguish the contribution of diffusion from other collisional processes by measuring the characteristic ${\ensuremath{\theta}}^{2}$ dependence of the decay rate. We also measure the systematic dependence of the decay rate on the buffer gas pressure over a range of 7000 to $90\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}000$ Pa. In this manner, we obtain diffusion coefficients at standard atmospheric pressure of $101\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}325$ Pa and at a temperature of $24.0(5)\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}\mathrm{C}$. We use two models to correct for systematic effects due to the transit time, one assuming a rectangular profile of the population distribution and a rectangular readout beam profile, and a second using Gaussian profiles. We obtain weighted averages of 0.33(5), 0.214(14), 0.132(7), 0.123(9), 0.093(9), and $0.073(4)\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$/s for Rb in He, Ne, ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$, Ar, Kr, and Xe, respectively. The number in parentheses represents one standard deviation of the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty. We also compare these data with diffusion coefficients obtained using quantum, classical, and semiclassical theoretical methods based on the most accurate interatomic interaction potentials from the literature. Near room temperature, simulations of $D$ using classical and quantum methods agree within their intrinsic, sub-1% standard uncertainties. We find that the semiclassical model only gives the correct orders of magnitude for $D$. Our computed diffusion coefficients based on the quantum theory agree with the experimental determinations when systematic effects are taken into account. Our measurements and modeling are relevant to the optimization of magnetometers, biomedical imaging using spin-polarized noble gases, tests of collision models based on interatomic potentials, and the development of pressure sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207