MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ConvLSTMTransNet: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Internet Traffic Telemetry

2024· article· en· W4408358661 on OpenAlexaff
Sajal Saha, Saikat Kumar Das, Glaucio H. S. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemetryComputer scienceThe InternetInternet trafficComputer networkDeep learningTelecommunicationsMultimediaArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a novel hybrid deep learning model, named ConvLSTMTransNet, designed for time series prediction, with a specific application to internet traffic telemetry. This model integrates the strengths of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Transformer encoders to capture complex spatial-temporal relationships inherent in time series data. The ConvLSTMTransNet model was evaluated against three baseline models: RNN, LSTM, and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), using real internet traffic data sampled from high-speed ports on a provider edge router. Performance metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Weighted Absolute Percentage Error (WAPE) were used to assess each model's accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that ConvLSTMTransNet significantly outperforms the baseline models by approximately 10% in terms of prediction accuracy. ConvLSTMTransNet surpasses traditional models due to its innovative architectural features, which enhance its ability to capture temporal dependencies and extract spatial features from internet traffic data. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of employing advanced architectures tailored to the complexities of internet traffic data for achieving more precise predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207