MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408360474 · doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.039

Patient and healthcare providers’ perspectives on participation in a postpartum pilot trial of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a qualitative study

2025· article· en· W4408360474 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lauren Andrew, Alexandra Garven, Taryn Taylor, Shannon M. Bates, Lisa Duffett, Suzanne Dubois, Ann Kinga Malinowski, Darine El‐Chaâr, Wee‐Shian Chan, Jennifer Donnelly, Céline Chauleur, Wessel Ganzevoort, Claire McCarthy, Hanke M.G. Wiegers, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Andréa Buchmuller, Paul Gibson, Saskia Middeldorp, Marc Rodger, Leslie Skeith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaCanadian Respiratory Research NetworkMcMaster UniversityWestern UniversityUniversity of AlbertaMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEli Lilly CanadaInternational Society on Thrombosis and HaemostasisEli Lilly and CompanyFoundation for Women and Girls with Blood DisordersMcMaster University
KeywordsVenous thromboembolismMedicineQualitative researchHealth careIntensive care medicineNursingFamily medicineSurgeryThrombosisPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is a need to better understand barriers to recruitment and participation in randomized controlled trials evaluating postpartum thromboprophylaxis, as previous trials had low recruitment and were not feasible. OBJECTIVES: In a qualitative interview study of a feasibility trial of low-dose aspirin vs placebo for 6 weeks postpartum (pilot PARTUM (Postpartum Aspirin to Reduce Thromboembolism Undue Morbidity) trial), we explored the facilitators and barriers to trial involvement. METHODS: Patients eligible for the pilot PARTUM trial, including those who declined to join the trial, were invited to participate in a qualitative study. Physicians whose clinical practice included caring for eligible patients were also invited to participate. Thirty-minute semistructured interviews were conducted by 2 researchers. Data were analyzed iteratively using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were 19 patients and 13 physician interviews conducted at a single Canadian center. Nine pilot PARTUM participants and 10 nonparticipants were included. Patients identified the simple study design and familiar oral medication ("Participating as an Easy Ask") and helping other parents ("Helping Other Parents by Providing Knowledge") as facilitators to participate in the trial. Most patients invoked altruism; however, their decision to participate in the trial was influenced by their perception of venous thromboembolism risk ("Venous Thromboembolism Risk Perception and Communication"), their birth experience ("Birth Experience Informs Perspective"), and their opinion of their obstetrical care provider ("Engaging Trusted Care Providers"). CONCLUSION: Trial participation is uniquely affected by experiences during pregnancy, delivery, and new parenthood. Improved understanding of the factors most important to patients will inform the design and conduct of future patient-focused clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis→Same topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→