MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408362252 · doi:10.1063/5.0256354

Investigation of the hydrodynamic pressure induced by landslide-generated impulse waves on a dam using physical similarity model experiments and numerical simulations

2025· article· en· W4408362252 on OpenAlexaff
Huanling Wang, Hangsheng Ma, Zhenggang Zhan, Xingjian Zhou, Weiya Xu, Wei‐Chau Xie

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhysicsImpulse (physics)MechanicsPhysical modellingLandslideSimilarity (geometry)Geotechnical engineeringClassical mechanicsGeophysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of landslide-generated impulse waves on dams releases substantial hydrodynamic pressures, posing severe threats to dam safety. In this study, physical similarity model experiments and numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the interaction between the impulse wave and dam. Based on the physical experiments, the variation of hydrodynamic pressures with runup heights of impulse waves, the variation at different horizontal directions and water depths is examined. The distributions of maximum hydrodynamic pressures, including positive hydrodynamic pressure (PHDP) and negative hydrodynamic pressure (NHDP), are studied. The influence of the runup height of impulse waves on the dam is analyzed. Using the discrete element method and smoothed particle hydrodynamics method, the influence of dam face inclination on hydrodynamic pressures is explored. The results show that the variation of hydrodynamic pressures is related to the impulse waves running up and the position of the dam surface. Below the positions where maximum hydrodynamic pressures occur, both PHDP and NHDP exhibit characteristics of initially decreasing rapidly, followed by a slower decrease. Furthermore, both PHDP and NHDP on the dam flanks are larger than those near the horizontal center of the dam. The runup height of the impulse wave has a positive influence on the maximum value of the hydrodynamic pressures, while the distribution characteristics remain almost unchanged. Based on the experimental results, empirical formulas for hydrodynamic pressures are established in both vertical and horizontal directions. Additionally, with decreasing dam face inclinations, the runup height of impulse waves, maximum PHDP, and rate of decrease in PHDP with water depth gradually increase. It is recommended to reinforce the dam surface in areas where hydrodynamic pressures are high, especially near the normal water level and on both flanks of the dam. This study contributes to enhancing the understanding of hydrodynamic pressures on dams under complex topographic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207