The <scp>PP2A</scp> ‐ <scp>B56</scp> Binding Site <scp>LxxIxE</scp> Contributes to Asp‐Mediated Spindle Pole Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The organization of microtubules into a mitotic spindle is critical for animal cell proliferation and involves the cooperation of hundreds of proteins whose molecular roles and regulation are not fully understood. The protein product of the Drosophila gene abnormal spindle , Asp, is a microtubule‐associated protein required for correct mitotic spindle formation. To better understand the contribution of Asp to microtubule organization during spindle formation, we reverse‐engineered flies to express a version of Asp (Asp LIE ), predicted to have lost its ability to bind the phosphatase trimer PP2A‐B56. We demonstrated that the Asp LIE mutation reduced an interaction with the Drosophila PP2A‐B56 regulatory subunit Widerborst (Wdb), as well as other proteins with known roles in spindle formation. Asp LIE flies exhibited less robust microtubule minus‐end cohesion at neural stem cell spindle poles, which was accompanied by a substantial developmental delay but no microcephaly. Predictive structural modeling suggests that the presence of Wdb alters the conformation of an Asp interaction with a tubulin dimer in a manner similar to that of the Asp LIE mutation. Protein localization in the Drosophila embryo, in addition to in vitro microtubule organization experiments, suggests that a role of PP2A may be to prevent Asp from contributing to microtubule cross‐linking at spindle microtubule plus ends. Together, these findings add new insights to mechanisms underlying microtubule organization within the mitotic spindle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".