A Recurrent Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Harboring an EML4–ALK Fusion Mutation with Sustained Response to Ensartinib: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. Lung cancer patients with ALK and EML4 fusions respond significantly to ALK inhibitors. The EML4-ALK fusion gene mutation is the result of an inversion of chromosome 2, which juxtaposes the 5 end of the EML4 gene with the 3 end of the ALK gene. In SCLC, the frequency of fusion genes is very low, and to the best of our knowledge, only four cases of ALK fusion gene mutations in SCLC have been reported. In this report, we describe the treatment of a 74-year-old female patient with SCLC who developed recurrence of hilar lymph node metastasis three years after surgical resection. Postoperative NGS showed that this patient is a SCLC patient harboring a rare EML4-ALK fusion mutation, and a satisfactory 43-month overall survival (OS) was achieved after treatment with ensartinib targeting the EML4-ALK fusion gene mutation. The ALK-TKI may be a new treatment option for these patients. This article provides a therapeutic reference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".