MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408388936 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v16i3.506

3 Wishes Without Borders: Enhancing End of Life Care for Hospitalized Patients

2021· article· en· W4408388936 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Julie C. Reid, France Clarke, Neala Hoad, Rajendar Hanmiah, Daniel Brandt Vegas, Zahira Khalid, Mark Soth, Feli Toledo, Lily Waugh, Jason Cheung, Anne Boyle, Anne Woods, Kathleen Willison, Jessica Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster University Medical CentreSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnd-of-life careIntensive care medicineNursingPalliative care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) was developed at St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton to humanize the dying process by engaging patients and families in last wishes. Our objective was to pilot the 3WP on medical wards to gauge interest in expanding outside the intensive care unit (ICU) where it began. Methods We enrolled medical patients who had a high probability of dying during their admission, eliciting, implementing, and documenting terminal wishes. We analyzed data descriptively. Results From January 2017 to March 2020, we enrolled 23 patients and elicited 117 wishes (mean five wishes/patient). Direct engagement in the wish process was possible for 57% of patients. Common wish categories were: facilitating connections, family care, and humanizing the environment. The mean cost/patient was $16; 85% of wishes incurred no cost to the program. Conclusions The initial patients garnered sufficient interest to warrant further expansion. The 3WP was affordable and characterized by increased patient engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207