MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408399717 · doi:10.3822/ijtmb.v18i1.1101

Deep Front Line Myofascial Release Versus Novel Soft Tissue Kinetic Chain Activation Technique (K-CAT) on Pain, Radiological Patellar Position and Dynamic Knee Valgus in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2025· article· en· W4408399717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anjali Punjani, Vijay Kage, Ashwin Patil, Peeyoosha Gurudut, Aarti Welling

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisKnee painValgusRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapySquatUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyMyofascial releaseSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative condition, afflicting large number of people globally. Fascia is a three-dimensional network of connective tissue that helps in force transmission along the myofascial chains to bone level causing malalignments and movement dysfunctions. Myofascial dysfunctions have been identified in osteoarthritis of knee as a pain-causing component. Recently, clinicians have aimed a variety of therapeutic techniques at fascia. There is a lack of literature to determine the effect of kinetic chain activation technique (K-CAT) as well as deep front line (DFL) release technique in OA knee. Purpose: The current study aimed to determine and compare the effectiveness of DFL release and K-CAT in knee OA. Methods: The study was a randomized clinical trial conducted in an outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Thirty-two (n = 32) participants between 45 and 60 years of age with knee osteoarthritis (grades 2 and 3) were included and randomized into two groups based on selection criteria. Group A received DFL myofascial release and Group B received K-CAT, along with common conventional therapy (modality + exercises), three sessions per week for 2 weeks. Pain intensity using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, skyline view of knee radiographic parameters including lateral patellar tilt angle (LPTA) and bisect offset (BO), dynamic knee valgus (DKV) by single leg squat using Kinovea software and quality of life using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score on day 1 and day 14 of intervention were assessed. Results: Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in both the groups for pain, BO on x-ray, DKV, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (p < 0.05). LPTA showed statistical significance only in the DFL group. However, between-group comparisons showed no statistical difference in all the outcomes (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both DFL myofascial release and K-CAT were found to be equally effective in alleviating pain, improving quality of life and knee malalignments.Trial registered under Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2023/11/059388).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & PracticeSame topicMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207