MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408402627 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319404

Evaluating the protective effects of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 21 ligand, CpG ODN, against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens

2025· article· en· W4408402627 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammadali Alizadeh, Samson Oladokun, Charlotte Fletcher, Nitish Boodhoo, Fatemeh Fazel, Bahram Shojadoost, Sugandha Raj, Jiayu Zheng, Khaled Abdelaziz, Shayan Sharif

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal HealthCanadian Animal Health InstituteMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroilerClostridium perfringensIleumJejunumBiologyCpG OligodeoxynucleotideCD163Immune systemLymphocyteImmunologyInternal medicineAndrologyGene expressionMedicineEndocrinologyDNA methylationGeneAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Necrotic enteritis (NE), caused by Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), presents a challenge to the global broiler industry. Evidence suggests that Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands can enhance the immune responses in chickens and protect them against infectious diseases. This study investigated the protective effects of TLR21 ligand class B CpG oligonucleotides (ODN) against NE in broiler chickens. On day 21 of age, chickens were injected with 50 or 100 μg CpG intramuscularly, and one group was injected with 50 μg CpG followed by a booster dose on day 22. Subsequently, birds were orally challenged with C. perfringens twice daily for three days, starting on day 22. On day 22, intestinal samples were collected for gene expression analysis. On day 25, all birds were euthanized, intestinal lesions were scored, and tissue samples were collected from the intestine for gene expression analysis, lymphocyte subset determination, and histomorphological analysis. Cecal contents were also collected for microbiome analysis. The results demonstrated that CpG pre-treatment, either at a single dose of 100 μg or two doses of 50 μg per bird, reduced lesion scores compared to the positive control. C. perfringens infection increased crypt depth in both the jejunum and ileum in the positive control group compared to both the CpG-treated group. At 22 days of age, CpG administration at doses of 100 μg per bird enhanced expression of TLR21, interleukin (IL)-2, CXCL8, IL-10, and interferon (IFN)-γ mRNA transcripts in both the jejunum and ileum. Additionally, at 25 days of age, the group pretreated with two doses of 50 μg of CpG per bird showed increased expression of all cytokines in both the jejunum and ileum compared to the control groups. The percentage of intestinal lymphocytes was not affected by CpG pre-treatment. However, CpG pretreatment at doses of 100 μg resulted in a higher abundance of the members of families Lactobacillaceae and Bacteroidaceae, which are crucial for maintaining gut health. In conclusion, our findings suggest that pretreatment of chickens with intramuscular administration of CpG may be effective in maintaining gut health during C. perfringens infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicImmune Response and Inflammation→French-language works237,207→