MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408403876 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.10.25323701

Abnormal gastric electrophysiology following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and associations with symptoms and quality of life

2025· preprint· en· W4408403876 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Hsu‐Han Wang, Chris Varghese, Sam Robertson, Grant Beban, Nicholas Evennett, Daphne Foong, Vincent Ho, Christopher N. Andrews, Armen A. Gharibans, Gabriel Schamberg

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institutes of HealthAuckland Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsMedicineGastrectomyElectrophysiologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicineGastroenterologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sleeve gastrectomy is an effective bariatric procedure, however may lead to persistent symptoms without obvious mechanical cause. The normal gastric pacemaker region, which lies on the greater curvature of the corpus, is resected in sleeve gastrectomy, however, the electrophysiological consequences are not adequately defined. This study assessed these impacts and associations with symptoms and quality of life (QoL), using non-invasive gastric mapping. Methods Patients with previous sleeve gastrectomy underwent body surface gastric mapping (Gastric Alimetry, New Zealand), comprising 30-minute fasting baseline and 4-hr post-prandial recordings. Analysis encompassed Principal Gastric Frequency (PGF), BMI-adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA-RI), with comparison to reference intervals and matched controls. Symptoms were evaluated using a validated App and questionnaires. Results 38 patients (median 36 months post-surgery; range 6-119 months) and 38 controls were recruited. 35/38 patients had at least one abnormal parameter, typically reduced frequencies (2.3±0.34 vs controls 3.08±0.21; p<0.001) and amplitudes (14.8±6.9 vs 31.5±17.8; p<0.001). Patients exhibited higher symptoms and lower QoL (PAGI-SYM 20 vs controls 7, p<0.001; PAGI-QOL 27 vs 136, p<0.001). Gastric amplitude and GA-RI correlated positively with bloating (r=0.71, p<0.001 and r=0.60, p=0.02) while amplitude correlated negatively with heartburn (r=-0.46, p=0.03). Lower gastric amplitudes also correlated with greater weight loss (r=-0.45; p=0.014). Conclusion Sleeve gastrectomy modifies gastric electrophysiology due to pacemaker resection, with variable remodelling. Substantial reductions in gastric frequency and amplitude occur routinely after surgery, and specific relationships between post-sleeve gastric amplitude, symptoms of heartburn and bloating, and weight loss are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments→French-language works237,207→