MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prediction of ground movement-induced pipe responses considering variable PGD magnitudes using physics-informed neural networks and transfer learning

2025· article· en· W4408405290 on OpenAlexaff
Pouya Taraghi, Yong Li, Samer Adeeb

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkVariable (mathematics)Movement (music)PhysicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAcousticsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long-distance buried pipelines are susceptible to Permanent Ground Displacements (PGDs) triggered by geo-hazards. Although pipeline routing is generally considered aiming to avoid areas with challenging geological conditions, this is not always feasible or possible due to economic, technical, and environmental constraints and uncertainties encountered by decision-makers. Therefore, the structural response of buried pipelines under PGDs is a major concern regarding pipe’s safety and integrity in the industry. This paper introduces a novel approach within a deep learning framework, specifically using a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), to (1) predict the elastic response of buried pipelines, such as Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) pipelines or steel pipelines in the elastic stage, under permanent ground displacement of varying magnitudes using a unified model and (2) evaluate the effects of different parameters, such as ground movement magnitude and direction, on pipeline responses. The accuracy of the predicted results is verified against two conventional numerical approaches, namely Finite Element (FE) and Finite Difference (FD) methods. The results and findings of this research demonstrate the promising capability of the PINN method in predicting both displacement and strain fields of pipelines subjected to a range of PGD magnitudes. The proposed approach using PINN can serve as a meshless, cost-effective, and simulation-free alternative for pipeline response prediction in integrity assessment. • A PINN model integrated with transfer learning predicts the response of buried pipelines under varying ground movement. • The PINN framework provides a simulation-free, mesh-free, and cost-effective approach for pipeline integrity assessment. • The study considers the effects of geometric nonlinearity and nonlinear pipe-soil interaction on pipeline responses. • Transfer learning within the PINN model significantly reduces training time. • Results show that ground movement magnitude and crossing angle substantially affect strain and deformation responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering StructuresSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207