Adjuvant PD-1 Blockade With Camrelizumab for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) experience disease relapse despite definitive chemoradiotherapy. The programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade camrelizumab has demonstrated considerable value in recurrent or metastatic NPC, while its role in locoregionally advanced NPC is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant camrelizumab for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from August 2018 to November 2021 at 11 centers in China and enrolling 450 patients with T4N1M0 or T1-4N2-3M0 NPC who had completed induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The final date of follow-up was March 20, 2024. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant camrelizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for 12 cycles; n = 226) or observation (standard therapy group; n = 224). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was event-free survival (freedom from distant metastasis, locoregional relapse, or death due to any cause). Secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, overall survival, safety, and health-related quality of life. Results: Among the 450 participants (mean age, 45 [SD, 10] years; 24% women), after a median follow-up of 39 (IQR, 33-50) months, the camrelizumab group had a 3-year event-free survival rate of 86.9%, whereas the standard therapy group had a rate of 77.3% (stratified hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89; P = .01). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 23 patients (11.2%) in the camrelizumab and 7 (3.2%) in the standard therapy group. Reactive capillary endothelial proliferation was the most common adverse event related to camrelizumab, occurring in 85.8% of patients at grade 1 or 2, while 2% of patients had grade 3 or 4 events. There was no significant deterioration in quality of life associated with camrelizumab treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: Adjuvant PD-1 blockade with camrelizumab significantly improved event-free survival with manageable toxicities, highlighting its potential role in the management of locoregionally advanced NPC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03427827.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".