MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408406342 · doi:10.47941/jfs.2578

Potentialites Nutritionnelles et Dietetiques des Chenilles Et Insectes Consommes en Rd Congo. Cas de Fruit de Mer, Cirina Forda, Imbrasia Ertli, Ruspolia Differens et Augosoma Centaurus

2025· article· en· W4408406342 on OpenAlex
Musala Kiyula François Par, Seya Crispin Mwidya, Mfuni Rene Kanga-Kanga, Mwamba M. Josee Mwana, Tshiovu Donatien Ntumba, Shanga Patrick Minga, Sivayiketera Esperance Kavugho, Vumilia Louange Nyamurombo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsInstitut de Technologie Agroalimentaire
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This research entitled "Nutritional and dietary potential of caterpillars and insects consumed in the DRC; case of seafood, Cirina forda, Imbrasia Ertli, Ruspolia dif]ferens and Augosoma centaurus" aims to promote and popularize the consumption of this category of food, because they compete with meat and fish in terms of protein and lipid content and also fruits and vegetables in terms of richness in vitamins and minerals. Finally, the aim is to make available the scientific data necessary for nutrition and dietetics. Methodology: We will conduct a bibliographic search to establish a state of the issue, define the objective, identify the originality and plan this study. Then, we will purchase and collect samples of caterpillars consumed in the DRC; we will carry out chemical analyses including humidity, total ash, crude proteins, lipids, total carbohydrates and mineral elements which were measured using the ICP 8300. Observation: we were able to say that the edible caterpillars analyzed are energetic ranging from 303 (Ruspolia Differens) to 493Kcal/g for Imbrasia Ertli, and represent an important source of proteins (ranging from 50.79 Ruspolia differens to 70.3 Augosoma centaurus). By their richness in Mg [ranging from 288.8 (Imbrasia Ertli) to 1476 mg/Kg (Augosoma Centaurus)]; In Ca [ranging from 202.7 (Imbrasia Ertli) to 950.8 mg/Kg for Fruit de Mer]; The caterpillars respectively have a preventive action against cancer and play a very active role in bone formation. Caterpillars have a curative power against arrhythmia and heart failure due to their richness in Ca, Mg, K and low fat content including in ascending order Ruspolia differens, Augosoma centaurus. They are remineralizing due to their richness in Mg of which the best is Augosoma centaurus; in Ca of which the best is seafood. They are anti-anemic due to their richness in Fe of which the best is Cirina Forda; in proteins of which the best is Imbrasia Ertli and in vitamins of group B (Vit. B12). Recommendation: the rational food consumption of caterpillars and insects in the same way as other foods is recommended and particularly in case of protein-energy malnutrition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it