MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408410055 · doi:10.53555/ephijse.v2i4.282

AI-Enabled Remote Monitoring and Telemedicine: Redefining Patient Engagement and Care Delivery

2016· article· en· W4408410055 on OpenAlexaff
Sujith Kumar Kupunarapu

Bibliographic record

VenueEPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemedicineMedical emergencyHealthcare deliveryMedicineComputer scienceHealth carePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applied in telemedicine and remote monitoring, artificial intelligence (AI) revolutionized current medicine. Artificial intelligence driven early disease discovery, ongoing health monitoring, and better general patient outcomes are changing patient therapy. Artificial intelligence improves the efficacy of telemedicine systems and remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems by means of powerful machine learning algorithms and predictive analytics, therefore providing real-time insights that assist healthcare professionals to make informed decisions. Especially in view of the COVID-19 epidemic, the rising need for remote medical services has made artificial intelligence increasingly more important in healthcare. By means of automated diagnostics, virtual health assistants, and predictive health analytics driven by artificial intelligence, technologies enable far higher patient involvement and treatment regimen compliance. Moreover, these technologies help to lower hospital readmissions and maximize the use of healthcare resources, therefore saving a great deal of money. Many case studies clearly indicate how much telemedicine and remote monitoring enhanced by artificial intelligence help. Wearable gadgets with artificial intelligence algorithms have been able to identify early symptoms of chronic diseases such diabetes and heart diseases, allowing fast treatments. Particularly in disadvantaged areas, artificial intelligence-powered chatbots and virtual consultations have improved healthcare accessible by means of constant medical support. Future remote healthcare delivery is predicted to use artificial intelligence ever more in importance. Improved predictive analytics, artificial intelligence driven tailored treatment plans, artificial intelligence with Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and their combined impact define current developments. Still, if we are to fully embrace artificial intelligence-driven telemedicine, issues including legislative bottlenecks, data privacy hurdles, and the need for rigorous cybersecurity laws must be resolved. Emphasizing major benefits, pragmatic uses, and future improvements in this swiftly expanding sector, this study explores how artificial intelligence changes remote monitoring and telemedicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPH - International Journal of Science And EngineeringSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207