MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408413897 · doi:10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100103

Mean arterial pressure in critically ill adults receiving vasopressors: A multicentre, observational study

2025· article· en· W4408413897 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle White, Zachary J Durkin, James P. McCullough, Kevin B. Laupland, Antony Attokaran, Aashish Kumar, Kiran Shekar, Peter Garrett, Jason Meyer, Alexis Tabah, Mahesh Ramanan, Stephen Luke, Anis Chaba, Rinaldo Bellomo, François Lamontagne, Paul J. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care and Resuscitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersQueensland HealthRajavithi Hospital
KeywordsMedicineCritically illObservational studyBlood pressureIntensive care medicineMean arterial pressureEmergency medicineAnesthesiaInternal medicineHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) management is a key aspect of treatment in critically ill patients receiving vasopressor therapy. Guidelines in different clinical subgroups have proposed various target MAP values. This study aimed to describe delivered MAP values and corresponding vasopressor doses in such patients. Design: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Setting: 12 ICUs in Queensland, Australia, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. Participants: Patients receiving vasopressors for at least six continuous hours in the ICU. We studied the delivered MAP values using hourly data based on averaging all validated values obtained from the ICU monitors and average hourly doses of vasopressors. Main Outcome Measure: The primary outcome was the mean MAP during the entire cohort's first 72 hours of ICU admission, whilst vasopressors were administered. Results: In 26,519 patients who received vasopressors for at least six continuous hours, the median age was 62 years, and 9,373 (35%) were admitted after elective surgery. The median time from ICU admission to vasopressor commencement was 2 hours, and the median duration of vasopressor therapy was 27 hours. At 72 hours, 6,627 (25.0%) patients remained on vasopressors. The mean hourly MAP was 72 mmHg in the first six hours, then steadily increased to ≈75 mmHg at 72 hours. In the first 72 hours, 11,032 (41.6%) patients had a mean MAP of 70-74 mmHg, and 5,914 (22.3%) had a mean MAP of 75-79 mmHg. For every clinical subgroup, a MAP of 70-74 mmHg was the most common mean MAP, and the proportion of patients with a mean MAP of 60-65mmHg was less than 5%. Conclusions: In a large, multicenter study of heterogeneous critically ill patients on vasopressors, the mean hourly MAP was > 70 mmHg. This mean hourly MAP was observed consistently over diverse clinical subgroups and is higher than recommended by guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care and ResuscitationSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207