MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408414220 · doi:10.5603/pjnns.103718

Predictors for long-term incomplete nidus obliteration following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4408414220 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maurycy Rakowski, Samuel D. Pettersson, Tomasz Klepinowski, Piotr Zieliński, Tomasz Szmuda

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiosurgeryMedicineIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsTerm (time)Arteriovenous malformationMeta-analysisRadiologyCerebral angiographyInternal medicineAngiographyRadiation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify predictive factors for long-term incomplete nidus obliteration following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search across the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases identified observational studies reporting such factors. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The study protocol was registered through PROSPERO. Each eligible study's quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for dichotomous parameters. RESULTS: Two high-quality prospective cohort and three high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included, covering patients with complete (n = 638) and incomplete (n = 297) nidus obliteration. The mean age of the patients was 25.54 ± 12.81 years and the mean follow-up time was 95.98 ± 27.64 months. Predictors for incomplete obliteration of nidus included: AVM classified as Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade ≥ IV (odds ratio (OR) 10.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-55.96, p = 0.006), the presence of multiple (> 1) feeding arteries (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.20-19.10, p = 0.0007), nidus volume > 10 mL (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.68-15.33, p = 0.004), and the occurrence of intranidal aneurysm (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.10-10.08, p = 0.03). No statistically significant difference in proportions of patients with incomplete nidus obliteration was found between paediatric (≤ 18 years) and adult (> 18) patient cohorts (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The following factors were found to be predictive for long-term incomplete nidus obliteration post-SRS for brain AVMs: SM grade equal to or higher than IV; the presence of multiple feeding arteries; AVM nidus volume exceeding 10 mL; and the occurrence of intranidal aneurysm. These findings will be beneficial in refining patient selection for radiosurgical treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.009
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologia i Neurochirurgia PolskaSame topicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207