MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408422417 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-704

Syn- to post-orogenic S-directed extension of the Kırşehir Massif, central Türkiye

2025· preprint· en· W4408422417 on OpenAlexaff
Kaan Onat, David Schneider, Bernhard Grasemann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMassifExtension (predicate logic)MathematicsChemistryGeologyGeochemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Alpine Orogeny resulted from the closure of the Neotethyan Ocean and the subsequent collision of Eurasia, Africa-Arabia and numerous microplates in between. The Kırşehir Massif is located at the NW corner of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (CACC) and offers insights into the tectonometamorphic evolution of CACC during Alpine orogenesis. The tectonostratigraphy is defined by a migmatitic core that grades into a metasedimentary lower unit comprising gneiss, amphibolite, micaschist, calcschist and quartzite, transitioning into metasedimentary rock alternations and overlain by marbles with amphibolite intercalations in the upper unit. The metamorphic rocks are correlated to the Paleozoic-Mesozoic Tauride platform sequence. Purported southward obduction of Late Cretaceous (90-85 Ma) Neotethyan supra-subduction zone ophiolitic slices onto the massif resulted in Barrovian metamorphism of these rocks, increasing from greenschist (SE) to granulite (NW) facies. Prograde metamorphism is evinced by Cpx-Ttn-Plg-bearing melanocratic bands within migmatites and compositionally zoned Mn-rich spessartine garnets in high-grade metaclastic rocks. Preliminary published monazite U-Pb geochronology on a Grt-Sil gneiss indicates migmatization occurred at c. 85 Ma. Epidote and chlorite halos around clinopyroxene and partially chloritized mica indicate minor retrogression to greenschist facies. The presence of late- to post-tectonic garnets suggests a tectonic quiescence during the retrograde stage. Our mapping reveals a consistent structural architecture across the massif characterized by subhorizontal planar foliation. Early folds (F1) are preserved in decimeter-scale microlithons. Two generations of recumbent folds are present in mylonites: dominant folds with NNW-SSE axes (F2a) that are associated with strong stretching and mineral lineations marked by quartz, amphibole, and mica trails, and local folds with ~E-W axes (F2b) in anisotropic layers with S-vergent drag folds. Sigmoids, flanking and asymmetric folds, and shear bands indicate a pervasive top-to-S sense of shear under ductile and brittle-ductile conditions, and boudinage, stretched veins, and extensional crenulation cleavage suggest synchronous layer parallel extension and vertical thinning. Brittle cataclasis is most obvious along the marble horizons, and the massif is dissected by numerous high-angle oblique faults related to post-Cretaceous/Paleocene wrench tectonics in the region. New in-situ white mica Rb-Sr geochronology from foliation-defining white mica yielded c. 75 Ma dates, and indicates deformation was coeval with c. 74-67 Ma calc-alkaline to alkaline intrusions in the western and northern margins of the massif. New zircon (U-Th)/He dates from the basement rocks are concordant with published apatite fission track dates, suggesting Paleocene rapid cooling, further confirmed by early Paleogene sedimentary basins unconformably overlying the basement. Notably, crustal thickness estimates in the CACC are ~35 km. Despite an earlier structural investigation linking exhumation to a top-to-W low-angle detachment fault along the western boundary of the massif, we instead prefer a model invoking syn- to post-orogenic extreme N-S extension and vertical thinning. This process triggers the collapse of ~55 km thick crust and subsequent uplift of the Kırşehir Massif since the Late Cretaceous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→