MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408426940 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-10608

Framework for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Policies in Mountain Environments

2025· preprint· en· W4408426940 on OpenAlexaff
Sofia Koliopoulos, Paolo Pogliotti, Daria Ferraris, Gianluca Filippa, Luca Mondardini, Fabrizio Sapone, Marta Galvagno

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Ecology and Soil Science
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeAdaptation (eye)Climate change adaptationEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyEnvironmental scienceGeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change has profound impacts on mountain ecosystems, making it imperative for local authorities to implement effective mitigation and adaptation strategies in order to improve the resilience of these important environments. In the Aosta Valley (Western Italian Alps) region, composed by mountainous terrain for 100% of its territory, regional and local stakeholders are actively committed to address climate change challenges. However, the complexity of the mountainous landscape, combined with the socio-economic needs of local communities, creates unique difficulties in defining and implementing policies that effectively address both environmental and societal resilience.In this work we present the coordinated framework developed by the Aosta Valley Region to integrate mitigation, adaptation, and sustainability measures. Key policy initiatives include a status quo of climate change in Aosta Valley (Rapport Climat), a road map for mitigation at 2040 (Fossil Fuel Free), adaptation (Regional Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation (SRACC)) and sustainability policies (Regional Strategy for Sustainable Development (SRSVS)), and lately the Regional Plan for Climate Change Adaptation (PRACC). This framework provides pathways to find innovative solutions including the active participation of scientists, stakeholders and citizens. Notably, the SRACC and PRACC policies are based on an interdisciplinary approach, focusing on specific actions that needed to be implemented in a short- or long-term vision for several socio-economic sectors. These documents also address cross-cutting challenges to define the priority efforts.In this context, the European Project Agile Arvier, especially through the Green Lab, aims to strengthen science-based polices communication to raise awareness and actively involve the population to foster the capacity to implement effective solutions in the mountains. The communication strategy will be oriented in positive terms, transmitting adaptation tools, focusing on the potential of the territory, thus enabling mountain communities to adapt and mitigate the impacts of climate change while achieving long-term sustainability.These coordinated efforts underscore the importance of integrating scientific knowledge, policy frameworks, and societal engagement to address the complex challenges of climate change in mountain environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0060.008
Research integrity0.0110.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Ecology and Soil ScienceFrench-language works237,207