Coastal Floods and the Lingering Effects of the Shelfbreak Jet - A case study of how local ocean currents contribute to coastal flooding in Southern New England (US)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In March of 2018, a winter storm hit Southern New England (US East Coast), with most of the coastal cities experiencing minor to moderate coastal floods. However, days after the storm passed and the winds and waves calmed down, the tide-gauge data continued to reach minor flooding levels. What was the cause of this prolonged recurrent flooding? Here we argue that the lingering effects of local ocean current dynamics contributed to this flooding.Along the US East Coast, an important driver of coastal sea-level variability is ocean dynamics, related to both large-scale circulation, such as the Gulf Stream, but also smaller local ocean currents. A relevant circulation feature in Southern New England is the Shelfbreak jet (SBJ). The SBJ flows equatorward from the Labrador Sea towards the Gulf Stream at Cape Hatteras following the shelf break along the Northeast US coast. In a recent study, we showed that the SBJ and sea level along the southern New England coast are highly correlated, especially at timescales of 1-15 days (Camargo et al., 2024). Since this frequency band coincides with the timescales of storm surges, we explore the implication of our findings for coastal flooding. We find that the SBJ explains, on average, about 25% of the storm surge variance for flood days along Southern New England. Specifically, for the March 2018 winter storm, SBJ dynamics are responsible for more than 90% of the storm surge observed 4 days after the peak of the storm. That is, there would have been no flooding so many days after the storm passed if not for SBJ-related-dynamics.Our results suggest local ocean dynamics are an important component of storm surges in Southern New England, and contribute to lingering flooding after a storm has passed. Thus, we advocate that ocean dynamics should be considered in flood studies elsewhere. Furthermore, our results suggest that focusing only on large-scale circulation, such as the Gulf Stream or ocean overturning, may not be satisfactory for understanding the most basic dynamics essential for making meaningful projections of the future.Reference: Camargo, C. M. L., Piecuch, C. G., & Raubenheimer, B. (2024). From Shelfbreak to Shoreline: Coastal sea level and local ocean dynamics in the northwest Atlantic. Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2024GL109583. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109583
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".