MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408428162 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-13084

A Thin and Weak Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB) Beneath the Oceanic Lithosphere and its Effects on Subduction Earthquake Cycle Deformation 

2025· preprint· en· W4408428162 on OpenAlexaff
Tianhaozhe Sun, Kelin Wang, Jiangheng He, Fumiaki Tomita, Takeshi Iinuma, Ryota Hino, Motoyuki Kido, Yusaku Ohta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAsthenosphereLithosphereSubductionSeismologySlabGeophysicsConvergent boundaryMantle (geology)Intraplate earthquakeLithospheric flexurePlate tectonicsOceanic crustTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous high-resolution seismological and magnetotelluric observations depict a sharp and distinct Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB) at the base of oceanic lithosphere, in some cases beneath the subducting slab. Many lines of evidence indicate ponding of partial melts at the LAB. A melt-rich oceanic LAB is expected to have a low viscosity to affect plate motion, subduction, and earthquake deformation. Therefore, it is important to seek direct geodetic evidence for the rheological weakness of the LAB and its effects on deformation. Here we summarize our recent progress in finding the evidence. (1) Immediately after several recent large subduction earthquakes (e.g., the 2011 Mw=9 Tohoku-oki and the 2010 Mw=8.8 Maule) in the Japan-Kuril and Chile subduction zones, GNSS observations show enhanced landward motion (ELM) of coastal areas 100s of km outside the rupture area. Using 3-D viscoelastic finite element models, we explained the postseismic ELM in terms of mechanical decoupling of the subducting slab from the underlying asthenosphere due to a low-viscosity LAB (Sun et al., 2024). The ELM observation is thus considered the first geodetic evidence for a weak LAB beneath subducting oceanic lithosphere. Assuming a thickness of no more than 10 km for the LAB, key characteristics of the observed ELM can be explained to first order by an LAB viscosity of no more than 5e16 Pa s, lower than typical mantle viscosities by 2-3 orders of magnitude. (2) In a more detailed investigation of the postseismic deformation following the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake, constrained by extraordinarily dense onshore and offshore (seafloor GNSS/Acoustic) geodetic measurements, we find that both near-field deformation and the more distant ELM can be optimally explained by having a thin (~5 km) and low-viscosity (~5e16 Pa s) LAB down to a depth of ~120-150 km. Our geodesy-based research adds a new dimension to the geophysical studies of the LAB and contributes to understanding the origin, spatial distribution, and consequence of the ponded partial melts.Sun, T., Wang, K., & He, J. (2024). Geodetic signature of a weak lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary in postseismic deformation of large subduction earthquakes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 630, 118619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118619

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→