MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408429030 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14676

Learning from mafic dykes in polymetamorphosed granulite terranes: an example from the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone

2025· preprint· en· W4408429030 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jérémie Darveau, Carl Guilmette, Antoine Godet, Marine Jouvent, Myriam Côté-Roberge, Kyle P. Larson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)Geological Survey of CanadaCentre de Géomatique du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranuliteMaficTerraneGeologyGeochemistryTectonicsPetrologySeismologyGeomorphologyFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mafic dykes can preserve near-peak metamorphic assemblages in granulitic terranes and often are key to deciphering their pressure-temperature-time-deformation (P-T-t-D) history. They are particularly important in high-grade polymetamorphic terranes, where younger metamorphic events may be poorly recorded in other units. The middle to lower crustal units of the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone (GFTZ) in western Québec, Canada, present a unique opportunity to address this issue, having experienced two metamorphic events separated by more than 1.6 billion years. The GFTZ exposes parautochthonous restitic orthopyroxene + garnet-bearing paragneisses and associated two-micas pegmatite dykes. These were formed in the Superior Craton during c. 2.6 Ga granulite-facies metamorphism (M1) and affected by a loosely constrained c. 1.0 Ga overprint during the Grenvillian orogeny (M2). Following M1 and prior to M2, the GFTZ have been intruded by Proterozoic gabbro dykes that can be used to monitor the conditions and timing of M2. In this contribution, we present new field relationships, whole rock geochemistry, in situ laser ablation U-Pb titanite and Lu-Hf garnet geochronology, along with isochemical phase equilibria modeling to provide quantitative P-T-t-D estimates of the metamorphism preserved in the mafic dykes.Field evidence shows that ~10 m thick metagabbro dykes cross-cut foliated paragneiss and pegmatite dykes. Their immobile element geochemical signatures are consistent with those from regionally recognized Proterozoic mafic dyke swarms intruding the Superior Craton. Metagabbros are characterized by an assemblage of plagioclase + hornblende + clinopyroxene + garnet + orthopyroxene + quartz + titanite. Garnet coronas surrounding relict magmatic clinopyroxene in contact with plagioclase are common in dyke cores, contrasting with granoblastic and migmatitic assemblages in dyke margins. Five metagabbro samples returned in situ Lu-Hf garnet dates in the range of 1124 to 920 Ma and U-Pb titanite dates from 1022 to 985 Ma, interpreted as the timing of M2 metamorphism and consistent with documented Grenvillian metamorphism. Isochemical phase equilibria modeling of a granoblastic hornblende + plagioclase + clinopyroxene + quartz + garnet migmatitic assemblage in a dyke margin indicate equilibrium conditions of 833 ± 12 °C and 9.9 ± 0.4 kbar, corresponding to mid- to high-pressure granulite conditions.Our results confirm a c. 1.0 Ga granulite-facies overprint attributed to the Grenvillian Orogen (M2). It is noteworthy that the high-grade assemblage is only expressed in the Proterozoic mafic dykes and that the host migmatitic paragneiss did not pervasively recrystallize during M2, potentially due to its restitic nature. This contrast in lithological reactivity resulted in a differential metamorphic record, emphasizing that the Grenvillian granulitic overprint could easily be overlooked if metagabbros are neglected. In conclusion, the results presented herein underscore the critical role of metamorphosed mafic dykes in disentangling the complex evolution of polymetamorphic granulitic terranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207