MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408429123 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14442

Combined in situ K/Ca and Rb/Sr geochronology of potassic mica

2025· preprint· en· W4408429123 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Barnes, Kyle P. Larson, Mark Button, Alfredo Camacho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyMicaIn situGeochemistryGeologyChemistryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In situ geochronology using laser ablation is essential for integrating microstructural and chemical records of minerals with their geochronological information. The in situ method is especially important for potassic mica, which readily deforms, often define rock structures and fabrics, and are susceptible to chemical modification by reactive fluids. In situ 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of mica has been widely used for decades and in situ Rb/Sr geochronology has recently emerged as a prevalent method. In contrast, in situ K/Ca geochronology has been demonstrated, but the method has not been refined or utilized. Combined in situ K/Ca and Rb/Sr geochronology was developed at the Fipke Laboratory for Trace Element Research (University of British Columbia, Okanagan), allowing direct comparison of the two isotopic systems and exploring the potential of K/Ca dating. The methodology was tested using two-mica leucogranites and migmatitic paragneisses from the central Seve Nappe Complex (SNC), comprising remnants of Baltican continental crust in the Scandinavian Caledonides. The central SNC consists of continental crustal rocks hosting volumetrically-subordinate eclogites, peridotites, and pyroxenites. The crustal lithologies record partial melting beginning at c. 484-480 Ma, while the (ultra)mafic lithologies provide evidence for high-pressure metamorphism at c. 460-454 Ma, altogether reflecting subduction-exhumation cycles of the central SNC. Subsequent collision of the Baltican continent with Laurentia led to widespread deformation and metamorphism in the SNC, starting at c. 430-425 Ma. Continental anatexis produced the studied leucogranites and migmatitic paragneisses; these rocks comprise quartz, white mica, biotite, plagioclase, K-feldspar, and clinozoisite, with accessory apatite, monazite, xenotime, and zircon. The accessory phases were dated via in situ U-Pb geochronology to compare with in situ white mica and biotite K/Ca and Rb/Sr geochronology results. The dates yielded by apatite (424 ± 15 Ma, 428 ± 17 Ma), monazite (427 ± 2 Ma), and xenotime (426 ± 2 Ma) are all within uncertainty (pooled age of 426.5 ± 1.4 Ma) and record the timing of continental collision. Zircon provide a wider range of concordant U-Pb dates (473 ± 8 Ma to 419 ± 5 Ma). White mica and biotite Rb/Sr isochron dates from all four examined rocks (438 ± 5 Ma, 430 ± 4 Ma, 433 ± 4 Ma, 431 ± 5 Ma) are slightly older than the apatite/monazite/xenotime and youngest zircon U-Pb dates, but still record continental collision. The same mica volumes yielded older K/Ca isochron dates (484 ± 21 Ma, 482 ± 14 Ma, 486 ± 15 Ma, 486 ± 12 Ma), similar to the oldest concordant zircon U-Pb dates and the overall timing of partial melting in the broader central SNC crustal rocks. The different K/Ca and Rb/Sr dates indicate that these two isotopic systems are decoupled in the same mica volumes, controlled either by interactions of Ca and Sr with the mica lattice or by diffusion gradients influenced by bulk rock composition. The results presented herein demonstrate that the K/Ca isotopic system has the potential for retrieving older geologic histories in polymetamorphic terranes. Further detailed investigations and continued development of the methodology, including improved reference materials, are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→