MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408429834 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15015

Aquamarine Mineralization in the Black River Batholith, Yukon Territory, Canada

2025· preprint· en· W4408429834 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lee A. Groat, Cem Ozyalcin, Catriona Breasley

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBatholithMineralization (soil science)GeographyGeologySoil sciencePaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The central Yukon Territory is renowned for its exceptionally abundant beryl occurrences. In 2003, widespread medium-blue aquamarine mineralization was discovered in the Black River Batholith, south-central Yukon. This aquamarine occurrence is notable because it is hosted in granodiorite, rather than being associated with pegmatites. Four distinct beryl occurrences have been documented in the batholith: (1) beryl with tourmaline, separated from the granodiorite by an aplite zone; (2) beryl with tourmaline bordering the granodiorite, with no aplite; (3) a set of beryl-quartz veins devoid of tourmaline, striking 70° and dipping 60° south; and (4) a second set of veins striking 315° and sub-vertical.This study aims to: first, compare the different types of aquamarine occurrences and identify distinguishing features; second, compare this occurrence with the Tsa Da Glisa emerald deposit (15 km northeast) and the true blue aquamarine locality (150 km northwest); and third, determine an accurate age for the Black River Batholith and compare it with nearby intrusions.The Black River Batholith, in the Finlayson Lake map area, is an Eocene-aged granitic intrusion emplaced within Cambrian to Lower Cambrian sedimentary rocks of the Kechika Group and Rosella Formation. It forms part of the geologically complex Canadian Cordillera, an orogenic belt formed by terrane accretion onto the Laurentian craton. Structurally, the batholith lies between the Tintina Fault to the north and the St. Cyr Thrust Fault to the southeast, with an elongated morphology aligned with these structures. These features suggest a complex tectonic evolution, potentially influenced by post-accretionary transcurrent faulting.The batholith is predominantly peraluminous, consisting of K-feldspar-phyric monzogranite to granodiorite, with accessory minerals like biotite, muscovite, and tourmaline. Previous geochronological investigations yielded discordant ages, with K-Ar dating of biotite ranging from 46.9 ± 2.6 Ma to 68 Ma. Nearby lithologically similar intrusions yielded K-Ar ages of 70 to 100 Ma, indicating either a distinctive emplacement history for the Black River Batholith, deficiencies in earlier dating methods, or subsequent reheating events.This study employs U-Pb zircon geochronology and whole-rock geochemical analysis to clarify the temporal and compositional relationships of the Black River Batholith with nearby intrusions and test its affiliation with the Cassiar Suite. Geochemical analysis of beryl-bearing and non-beryl-bearing granitoids will help delineate the chemical provenance of the beryl occurrences. Additionally, we will use SEM and EPMA to investigate compositional variations among beryl occurrences and zoning within individual beryl crystals, providing insights into their chemical affinities and source divergences. This integrated approach aids in reconstructing the Black River Batholith’s emplacement history and enhances our understanding of the region's magmatic evolution.This study is significant because it addresses long-standing uncertainties regarding the batholith’s emplacement age, its relationship to nearby intrusions, and the origins of its unusual beryl occurrences. These occurrences have not been studied in detail before and may provide valuable insights into magmatic-hydrothermal processes in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→