MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408430102 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15744

Palaeogeography of the Eastern Tauern Window (Eastern Alps, Austria)

2025· preprint· en· W4408430102 on OpenAlexaff
Wolfgang Frank, Bernhard Grasemann, Thomas Meisel, Jennifer Spalding, David Schneider, Benjamin Huet, Christoph Iglseder, Daniela Gallhofer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalaeogeographyWindow (computing)GeologyGeographyPaleontologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Tauern Windows in the Eastern Alps is one of the most spectacular tectonic window, which formed after opening and closure of the Alpine Tethys between Europe and the Adriatic micro-continent. The herein described paleogeographical model is based on a new lithostratigraphic unit, the Wörth Formation, which formed as a local Jurassic black shale deepwater trough below the CCD on a strongly attenuated crustal basement. It developed as an oblique depression between the European continent and the Permian-Jurassic metasediments of the Seidlwinkl Nappe, which became an isolated element during opening of the Alpine Tethys. The Wörth Formation trough terminated to the NW within the European continent but maintained an open connection to the main Alpine Tethys towards SE. Different clastic sediments were derived from both sides of the trough: detrital mica-rich sandstones intruded by gabbroic laccoliths (167 Ma), olistoliths and re-sedimentation of Keuper beds, yet no indication of Triassic carbonates were derived from the northern side. In contrast, the deposits on the southern side are characterized by carbonate-bearing quartz-schists, breccias of Triassic carbonates, arkoses and tectonic slivers from the basement (Modereck crystalline).Radiolarites and “Aptychen” limestones are useful marker lithologies for better lithostratigraphic interpretations. Until now Aptychen limestones got little attention, but could be recognized in all environment and most tectonic units from the Matrei Zone to the Klammkalk Zone. Rare locations have been detected, where at the base of the Glockner nappe a primary sedimentary succession of siliciclastic Jurassic into the typical marly “Kalkglimmerschiefer” lithology has been preserved. The Sandstone-Breccia unit is now understood as a continuously pro-grading accretionary wedge, containing considerable portion of clastics, derived from the southern border of Alpine Tethys and emplaced during post-Albian times on the northern parts of the Wörth Formation. White mica Ar ages, clustering regionally at 30 my and only little younger restricted apatite FT ages (see Spalding et al. Poster Session GD9.1) indicate early cooling due to a detachment process (see Brunner et al. Poster Session GD9.1) at the frontal part of the accretionary wedge.The complex paleogeography has also important consequences for the tectonic evolution history: It caused the contrasting structural architecture of the Glockner nappe W and E of the Rauris valley and the restriction of the HP-rocks (lawsonite pseudomorphs, eclogites) to the western side of Glockner nappe. The basement units of the eastern Tauern window should not interpreted as the direct continuation of the western basement. Earlier interpretations for different rifting ages in this part of Alpine Tethys, Jurassic in the S and Cretaceous in the N, lost their validity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→