MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408430339 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-14161

Surface NO2 Derived from Pandora Column Measurements in Toronto and Detroit-Windsor

2025· preprint· en· W4408430339 on OpenAlexaffabout
Darby Bates, Ramina Alwarda, Kimberly Strong, Xiaoyi Zhao, Vitali Fioletov, Sum Chi Lee, Yushan Su

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindsorColumn (typography)Surface (topology)Environmental scienceGeographyEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsGeometrySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric trace gases near the Earth’s surface can have important human and environmental health impacts. In particular, the trace gas nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which is commonly emitted by traffic, biomass burning, and industrial sources, can be a major threat to human respiratory health, leading to increased rates of asthma, lung cancer, and overall mortality. In the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and in the Detroit-Windsor Area (DWA), NO2 and other trace gases are being measured by ground-based Pandora UV-visible spectrometers that are part of the Pandonia Global Network. We present NO2 surface volume mixing ratios derived from Pandora direct sun total column measurements to monitor air quality in these two urban areas. The conversion method uses three inputs in addition to the Pandora total columns: (1) the stratospheric NO2 column from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), (2) the free troposphere NO2 column from the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, and (3) the ratio of NO2 surface volume mixing ratio to planetary boundary layer column from Environment and Climate Change Canada’s regional air quality forecast model, Global Environmental Multi-scale-Modelling Air quality and Chemistry (GEM-MACH). The derived estimates of surface NO2 are compared with in situ measurements, and their level of agreement is assessed for dependence on meteorological conditions, including wind speed and direction, temperature, and boundary layer height. The mean bias between the derived estimates and in situ measurements ranges from -1.0 ppbv to -2.6 ppbv. This bias has been found to vary with boundary layer height, so a method to account for this dependence has been developed to improve the results. This presentation will provide an overview of this column-to-surface conversion method, a summary of results for each site in the GTA and DWA, and an outline of plans toward using this approach to improve and validate satellite estimates of surface NO2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207