Using a multi-tracer approach to assess wastewater contaminant inputs to surface waters from onsite wastewater treatment systems 
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantifying contaminant inputs from onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) to surface waters is needed in many watersheds to inform water quality management programs. This quantification is challenging due to the distributed locations of OWTSs across rural watersheds and uncertainties regarding the fate of the various wastewater contaminants in the environment. The objectives of this study were to i) identify the dominant pathways via which contaminants from OWTS reach streams, and ii) evaluate whether contaminant loads reaching streams from OWTS varies between watersheds with different physical and socio-economic characteristics, and between dry and wet weather conditions. These objectives were addressed by combining geospatial mapping, field investigations, and statistical analyses with the study focused on watersheds in Ontario, Canada. Detailed stream sampling was conducted in four watersheds with human wastewater tracers including artificial sweeteners (acesulfame, saccharin, cyclamate, sucralose) and microbial source tracking markers (HF183 and human mitochondrial markers) used to untangle the pathways via which OWTS-derived contaminants may be transported to streams. In addition, widespread sampling was conducted across 53 watersheds to assess the influence of physical and socio-economic characteristics on OWTS-derived contaminant inputs to streams. The data indicate that more contaminants reach streams during wet weather conditions and contributing pathways include groundwater transport as well as more rapid pathways including residential and agricultural tile drains. For more conservative contaminants, the amounts of contaminants reaching streams were significantly higher in watersheds with older households and with low topographic wetness index, but for less conservative contaminants other factors including the distance between OWTS and streams may be important. The findings of this study are needed to inform OWTS best management practices and to improve contaminant load estimates to streams. 
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".