MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408434138 · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112368

Transverse reinforcement configurations in GFRP-reinforced concrete columns: Experiments and damage mechanics-based modeling

2025· article· en· W4408434138 on OpenAlex
Alireza Sadat Hosseini, Pedram Sadeghian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReinforcementFibre-reinforced plasticStructural engineeringMaterials scienceReinforced concreteDamage mechanicsTransverse planeComposite materialEngineeringFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of transverse reinforcement configurations on the strength and deformability of concrete columns reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and ties were studied, with emphasis on post-peak performance. A new experimental method exposed columns without concrete cover to directly observe the failure modes of longitudinal and transverse GFRP bars. The experiments were supported by 3D finite element (FE) models using concrete damage plasticity (CDP) for concrete and the LaRC05 failure criteria for GFRP bars. The findings reveal that reducing the tie spacing from 12 d b to 6 d b ( d b is the longitudinal bar's nominal diameter) increased the deformability index from 0.25 to 0.8 and enhanced post-peak load retention from 0.001 μm/m to 0.011 μm/m. Increasing the tie overlap length from 20 d t to 28 d t ( d t is the tie's nominal diameter) improved confinement, delaying bar buckling and increasing second peak load by 17 %. Additionally, using fasteners at 3 d t intervals on tie overlaps maintained tie integrity post-peak, ensuring more stable behavior. Large-scale tests from the literature were analyzed and categorized into three deformability classes based on axial load-displacement and stress-strain behavior. A deformability index, I AD , was proposed, showing a linear relationship with the transverse reinforcement ratio, ρ t , with a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.84. A comparative analysis of FEM approaches for modeling GFRP-RC columns further validated these findings. • A test method was developed to closely monitor column behavior with exposed reinforcement. • Advanced FEM analysis was used to capture damage in concrete and 3D bars and was compared with a common simpler method. • Optimal tie spacing, overlap lengths, and fastener intervals are recommended to enhance column deformability. • A new deformability index predicts post-peak behavior in load-displacement and stress-strain curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it