Predicting alexithymia in female adolescents based on early maladaptive schemas and parental mind theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate alexithymia's prediction in adolescent girls based on early maladaptive schemas and parental mind theory. Method: This was a descriptive correlational study and the statistical population was the secondary high school girls in Tehran in the academic year 2018-2019, which using random multi-stage cluster sampling method first among the secondary schools for girls in regions 5, 9, 12, and 21 of Tehran was selected, and three high schools were selected from each region and 300 students were selected to participate in the research based on the Cochran's formula, maintaining the principle of confidentiality and consent. Toronto Emotional Dysfunction Questionnaire (1994), Young's Early Maladaptive Schema Short Questionnaire (1998), and Baron-Cohen Mind Reading Test (2001) were used to collect data. Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: The results showed that there was a positive and significant relationship between the scores of the components of the initial maladaptive schemas of the parents with the alexithymia of the girls (P = 0.01); There is also a negative and significant relationship between the score of parent's mind theory and alexithymia (P = 0.01). Also, stepwise regression coefficients showed that the standard schemas such as stubbornness (β = 0.24, P = 0.001), self-disciplinary (β = 0.33, P = 0.001), and abusive (β = 0.41, P = 0.001), Mind theory (β = 0.43, P = 0.001), Release (β = 0.48, P = 0.001), Emotional inhibition (β = 0.50, P= 0.001), imperfection and shame (β = 0.52, P = 0.001), and entitlement (β = 0.53, P = 0.001) were able to predict alexithymia. Conclusion: Maladaptive schemas affect female students' alexithymia; therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to maladaptive schemas and mind theory in parents in correcting and treating people with maladaptive schemas and alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it