MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408438712 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-5622

The impact of wildfires on the abundance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in soils of Northwestern Canada

2025· preprint· en· W4408438712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pia Voitz, Stefan Kruse, Yadav Ankit, Elisabeth Dietze

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)Soil waterEnvironmental chemistryPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonEnvironmental scienceChemistrySoil scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intensifying wildfire regimes under climate change, as expressed, for example, in the recent fire seasons in the boreal zones, call for an improved understanding of the impacts of forest fires on air, water and soil quality. One group of compounds released during wildfires are the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), of which many are considered toxic for organisms, including human health.This study investigated 13 sites along a transect across five boreal forest and tundra biomes for the abundance and composition of 16 USEPA listed PAHs in soil organic and mineral horizons. Accelerated solvent extraction in a combination with organic solvents (MeOH:DCM and n-hexane:DCM) was used for PAHs extraction and subsequently analyzing them using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5975C mass spectrometer. We tested how far distance to the nearest fire event (15 years), total PAH concentrations declined significantly (range: 0.7 to 1806.7 ng/g) in comparison to recent fire sites, likely due to degradation and wash-out processes. Litter horizons generally exhibited higher PAH levels than organic and mineral horizons, with high molecular weight (HMW) PAHs dominating (~30% LMW vs. ~70% high molecular weight). Apparently, the distance to the fire source had no significant effect on PAHs abundance. However, fire intensity, as indicated by fire radiative power (FRP) and dNBR, correlated with PAHs levels in the litter horizon, suggesting that temperature and combustion conditions are critical determinants of PAHs formation and persistence. Diagnostic PAHs ratios also confirmed the predominance of pyrogenic sources. These initial findings highlight the post-fire loss of PAHs via degradation and wash-out, reducing soil toxicity over time. More research might focus on a high-resolution soil and water monitoring shortly after wildfires to better understand how far degradation and wash-out dominates PAHs loss that could shift burning residues from soil to water biomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact→French-language works237,207→