MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408439540 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-5486

Sediment transport and deglacial incision of the upper Mississippi River inferred from luminescence dating

2025· preprint· en· W4408439540 on OpenAlexaff
Svenja Riedesel, Andrew D. Wickert, Fiona J. Clubb, Phillip H. Larson, Tony Reimann, Andreas Peffeköver, Shanti B. Penprase, Tammy M. Rittenour, Eric Barefoot, Jimmy Wood, Matthew Kuchta, Peter Mitchell, Isaac J. Larsen, Carrie E. Jennings

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyThermoluminescence datingFeldsparAggradationSedimentFluvialQuartzTerrace (agriculture)LandformOptically stimulated luminescencePleistoceneGeomorphologyGeochemistryPaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As rivers sculpt their valleys and floodplains, they transport sediments – primarily quartz and feldspar – from source regions to the sea. These complex sediment-transport processes, difficult to study even over short time scales, can eventually build systems of river terraces, which in turn can record the impacts of past climate on Earth-surface systems. To study both sediment-transport and landform-building processes, we focus on the deglacial fluvial record stored in the upper Mississippi valley.We collected terrace sediment samples for luminescence dating along a 1000 km long section of the upper Mississippi River. The two minerals most commonly targeted for optically stimulated luminescence dating, quartz and feldspar, show different responses to sunlight bleaching, with quartz resetting much faster than feldspar. Furthermore, different grain sizes in fluvial deposits would have likely been transported at different water depths, likely resulting in varying sunlight exposure. However, the latter has not yet been fully explored. We combine luminescence measurement results from two grain sizes for quartz (fine silt and fine to medium sand) on the multi-grain aliquot level with single grain luminescence measurements of sand-sized feldspar to inform on bleaching processes during sediment transport and refine the age of late Pleistocene Mississippi River incision.We combine our two-mineral-luminescence approach with 14C ages obtained from organic matter and a new cosmogenic 10Be profile within Savanna Terrace fill. Based on 14C and luminescence ages, aggradation continued until ~23–17 ka. Following this, the Mississippi River incised below the Savanna Terrace tread ~14–12 ka, corresponding to outburst floods from Lakes Agassiz and Superior, with timing provided by luminescence ages and the 10Be profile. The pattern of bleaching with distance downstream suggests spatially variable dominant sediment sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→