MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408439766 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5178675

Guidance on Minimum Information Requirements (Mir) for Designing and Reporting Human Biomonitoring (Hbm) Studies

2025· preprint· en· W4408439766 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Zare Jeddi, Karen S. Galea, Jillian Ashley‐Martin, Julianne Nassif, Tyler Pollock, Devika Poddalgoda, Konstantinos M. Kasiotis, Kyriaki Machera, Holger M. Koch, Ming Kei Chung, Kate E. Jones, Adrian Covaci, Yu Ait Bamai, Mariana F. Fernández, Natalie von Goetz, Henriqueta Louro, Maria João Silva, Tiina Santonen, Andromachi Katsonouri, Argelia Castaño, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Elizabeth Z. Lin, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, Ana Virgolino, Paul T.J. Scheepers, Vicente Mustieles, Ana Cañas, Susana Viegas, Robert Kaše, Ovnair Sepai, Emily Bird, Thomas Göen, Manosij Ghosh, Silvia Fustinoni, Hubert Dirven, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Courtney C. Carignan, Yuri Mizuno, Yuki Ito, Yankai Xia, Shoji F. Nakayama, Konstantinos C. Makris, Patrick J. Parsons, Melissa Gonzales, Michael Bäder, Mária Dušinská, Aziza Menouni, Radu Corneliu Duca, Kaoutar Chbihi, Samir El Jaâfari, Lode Godderis, An vanNieuwenhuyse, Asif Qureshi, Imran Ali, Carla Costa, João Paulo Teixeira, Alena Bartoňová, Giovanna Tranfo, Karine Audouze, Steven Verpaele, Judy S. LaKind, Hans Mol, Jos Bessems, Barbara Magagna, Maisarah Nasution Waras, Alison Connolly, Marc A. Nascarella, Wonho Yang, Po‐Chin Huang, Jueun Lee, Henri Heussen, Özlem Göksel, Masud Yunesian, Leo W. Y. Yeung, Gustavo Henrique Bianco de Souza, Ana Maria Vekic, Erin N. Haynes, Nancy B. Hopf

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsGovernment of CanadaHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomonitoringComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Management scienceBusinessEngineeringBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.261
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.503
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2610.503
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.008
Bibliometrics0.0120.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0150.008
Research integrity0.0310.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207