MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Next-Gen Dermatology: Revolutionizing Dermatological Diagnostics with AI and Emergency Care Solutions

2025· article· en· W4408443053 on OpenAlexaff
D Yashas, M Shivani Kashyap, Charan PR, Hemanth Kumar GP, Abhishek BK, C Deekshith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermatologyDermatological diseasesMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skin health conditions should be diagnosed and treated on time so as to prevent complications and promote better health results. This paper presents an AI-based system that makes use of Convolutional Neural Networks with the InceptionV3 Architecture for predicting skin diseases at higher levels. The model, which is based on the large DermaNet dataset, classifies skin disorders fast and effectively. The system is coupled with a simple Telegram based application for the users to get a complete solution. A user can upload a photo of the affected skin area and get a diagnosis within seconds, an explanation of the disease and how severe it is in percentage. The bot also has a location and contact sharing feature that assists users in finding nearby doctors and clinics that can provide further assistance. It further provides on the spot appropriate cures for the particular condition diagnosed. Moreover, this makes it possible for the customer to fill the healthcare void in particular the neglected ones by making it easy for them to access real time high quality services. By equipping users with relevant information and appropriate actions required at the right time, this project has showcased how AI has the ability to transform the dermatological field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207