MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408444629 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1491

UAV-LiDAR-Photogrammetry analyses of Stress-Release Structures in Southern Ontario, Canada: Implications for Regional Seismic Hazard Assessment

2025· preprint· en· W4408444629 on OpenAlex
Alexander L. Peace, Joseph I. Boyce, A.N.G. Clark, Lawrence Wejuli, Wayna Sattar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLidarSeismologyIntraplate earthquakeDevonianInduced seismicityTransectStress fieldFault (geology)TectonicsSeismic hazardRemote sensingOceanographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismicity in eastern North America occurs in sporadic clusters distal from plate boundaries throughout western Quebec and continues with typically lower magnitude and frequency events in southern Ontario and the Great Lakes region. Although M4-5 earthquakes have been recorded in southern Ontario, there is limited understanding of regional seismogenic structures, the state of stress, and reactivation potential of basement faults. Stress-release structures, such as ‘pop-ups’, whilst somewhat rare and poorly documented, have been previously reported across the region. These structures can be produced by far-field intraplate tectonic processes far from plate boundaries, and thus can be used infer stress states and assess seismic hazard potential. This study aims to document, analyse, and interpret potential stress release features, including pop-ups, in southern Ontario, Canada. Employing a DJI Matrice 350 RTK with an L2 LiDAR payload and Emlid RS3 DGPS, we conducted a high-resolution (sub-cm) LiDAR and photogrammetry survey of well-exposed pop-ups at Wainfleet Wetlands, a former aggregate quarry located ~4 km west of Port Colborne, Ontario. 250 MHz ground-penetrating radar (GPR) profiles were also collected along several transects across the folds. Previous work here had identified at least two ~NW-SE oriented curvilinear pop-up structures ~100 m each in length within Devonian dolomitic limestones of the Onondaga Formation. The features exhibit en-echelon fractures with stepovers, indicating complex fault geometries and reactivation history. Regional estimates of the maximum horizontal stress (σH) suggest σH is ~NE-SW, consistent with the pop-up orientations and formation by far-field intraplate stresses.  FracPaQ analysis of fracture orientation, density (P20) and intensity (P21) on UAV-orthomosaics reveals deviations from regional fracture orientations and an increase in P20 and P21 proximal to pop-ups compared to nearby outcrops on the Lake Erie shoreline. GPR profiles imaged the internal geometry of fold structures to a depth of > 5 m.The pop-ups are interpreted as stress-release buckles triggered by local overburden removal during quarrying. This initial work indicates that stress-release structures are perhaps more widespread, and structurally complex, in southern Ontario than previously considered, and that they may inherit complex geometries from deep-seated faults. Our work underscores the need to seek out and document other potential stress-release structures elsewhere in the region to elucidate their implications for intraplate stress and thus seismic hazards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207