MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408445333 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-1313

The Fast Borealis Ionosphere: New observations and insights from mapping the polar ionosphere every four seconds

2025· preprint· en· W4408445333 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel Billett, Remington Rohel, C. J. Martin, K. A. McWilliams, K. M. Laundal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonospherePolarPolar capGeodesyGeologyGeophysicsPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past three decades, ionospheric drift velocity measurements from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) have been combined at a nominal time resolution of two minutes to produce horizontal patterns of the high-latitude convective flow. Recently, SuperDARN radars operated by the University of Saskatchewan (codenamed Borealis), which overlook much of the northern hemisphere polar cap, have been upgraded to enable a form of scanning which can be carried out every 3.7 seconds without compromising on the large field-of-views of the radars. When data from all Borealis radars are combined, a 32-fold temporal resolution improvement over traditional SuperDARN convection maps is achieved. We call this new data product the Fast Borealis Ionosphere (FBI).The SuperDARN FBI allows for the study of highly transient and quickly evolving ionospheric phenomena (or the order of seconds) that span several thousands of kilometres, such as transient flow bursts, polar cap patches, substorm-related enhancements, and more. In this presentation, we show FBI results for events highlighting its capabilities in capturing transient ionospheric dynamics, along with several conjunction studies with satellites and other ground-based instruments (such as all-sky cameras).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→