MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408447006 · doi:10.1063/5.0256077

Pore-scale analysis of regular and irregular sintered wick structures in heat pipes

2025· article· en· W4408447006 on OpenAlexaff
G. R. Abdizadeh, Sahar Noori, Mohammad Saeedi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsScale (ratio)MechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study employs pore-scale simulations to investigate permeability (k), maximum velocity (Umax), and average velocity (Uave) across three sintered porous structural configurations: irregular, regular, and uniform. The irregular structure, characterized by random particle sizes and arrangements, exhibited the highest permeability and maximum velocity, due to enhanced pore connectivity and size variability. In contrast, due to compact and evenly distributed pores, the uniform structure (fixed particle sizes and arrangements) exhibited the lowest values. The regular structure, with fixed particle sizes and random arrangements, achieved intermediate results, balancing the advantages of randomness with the constraints of uniform particle sizes. Pore-scale geometries were generated using MATLAB, and fluid flow properties were simulated in COMSOL Multiphysics. Clustering analysis of the irregular structure was performed to assess permeability, maximum velocity, and pore size distributions. The analysis identified three distinct clusters for all parameters: high-performance clusters associated with large interconnected pores, moderate clusters corresponding to transition zones, and low-performance clusters linked to smaller, isolated pores. For permeability, the high-performance cluster showed a significant increase, while smaller pores exhibited much lower permeability. Similar trends were observed for velocity and mean inter-particle distance, with the high-performance cluster consistently outperforming others. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed significant differences among the configurations (p < 0.01 for k; p < 0.05 for Umax). The irregular structure consistently outperformed the other configurations across all evaluated parameters. Additionally, increasing porosity across all configurations improved permeability and velocity, stressing the pivotal role of pore connectivity in optimizing fluid flow pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207