Successful Vitrification of Human Osteochondral Dowels and Intact Femoral Condyle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Cryopreservation via vitrification of articular cartilage (AC) will increase the availability of graft tissue for treating large joint defects. To advance this research area, we compared the effects of 2 cryopreservation protocols in which 10-mm diameter human osteochondral dowels were cooled and stored in liquid nitrogen vapor. Design Dowels collected from healthy human knee joints ( n = 3 donors) of deceased donors were randomly assigned to Protocol 8 (430 min) or Protocol 2BWF (410 min). Post-warming chondrocyte viability was assessed and normalized to fresh controls. Results Both protocols resulted in high chondrocyte viability after loading, vitrification, and rewarming (~80% of fresh control). Protocol 2BWF was subsequently used to vitrify and rewarm 3 human intact lateral femoral condyles. After rewarming, metabolic activity, normalized chondrocyte viability, histology, and matrix productivity were experimentally measured. Results documented ~82% of fresh chondrocyte viability post vitrification and rewarming, with similar results to the fresh control group on the other AC quality criteria. Conclusion These results demonstrate that both Protocol 8 and Protocol 2BWF can preserve the quality of vitrified human AC in osteochondral dowels and human intact femoral condyles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".