Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rise of individualism and modernism, a strict divide appeared between consumption and production so that individuals ended up confined to passive consumer roles. Concomitantly, postmodernism and a renewed sense of community fostered by digital channels such as websites, apps, platforms and social media blurred that distinction. With hybridized forms of exchange intertwining consumption and production/distribution, individuals reclaimed a more active stance that is also more meaningful. This chapter delves deeper into that process and its implications for sustainability. The text opens with an introduction outlining the historical evolution from modernism to postmodernism and the changes incurred by marketing over that period. After discussing the modernism-postmodernism divide, the text introduces the opposition between individualism and collective approaches to life and consumption. This serves as conceptual foundations to the subsequent discussion on the collaborative economy and its counterpart collaborative consumption. Both approaches are then connected to the broader concept of the circular economy (or circularity in the economy) to demonstrate the relevant link between renewed forms of consumption and sustainability. With the acknowledgement of consumers’ greater diversity of roles, the last section outlines the rise of the creator economy and creative consumption before wrapping up with a conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".