MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408460323 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf124

Annual Variant-Targeted Vaccination to Prevent Severe COVID-19 in Cohorts With Vaccine-Derived and Hybrid Immunity

2025· article· en· W4408460323 on OpenAlexaff
J. Daniel Kelly, Katherine J. Hoggatt, Nathan C. Lo, Samuel Leonard, W. John Boscardin, Hye Sun Kim, Emily N. Lum, Charles Austin, Amy L. Byers, Phyllis C. Tien, Peter C. Austin, Dawn M. Bravata, Salomeh Keyhani

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
FundersClinical Science Research and DevelopmentNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationCohortBooster (rocketry)Booster doseImmunityPropensity score matchingPneumoniaHerd immunityVaccine efficacyCohort studyImmunologyInternal medicineImmune systemImmunization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine recommendations in the United States (US) provide guidance for adults to receive at least annual variant-targeted vaccination. We sought to estimate the strength and durability of protection from annual variant-targeted vaccination against severe COVID-19 illness in individuals with vaccine-derived and hybrid immunity. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using an electronic health record-based, propensity score-matched (1:1) cohort of US Veterans. Booster-vaccinated adults were eligible for a variant-targeted messenger RNA (mRNA) booster starting 1 September 2022. Matched sets of those who did and did not receive the variant-targeted booster dose were identified on a weekly basis, and the cohort was followed until 31 August 2023. Outcomes were hospitalization due to COVID-19 pneumonia and in-hospital severe illness. We fit Cox models, overall and stratified by last documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (pre-Omicron, Omicron), to estimate relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). RESULTS: The propensity score-matched cohort consisted of 1 576 626 COVID-19 booster-vaccinated adults. Estimates of rVE from variant-targeted mRNA booster against hospitalization due to COVID-19 pneumonia were significant and similar in the cohort with vaccine-derived immunity (rVE, 29% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 25%-34%]) and cohort with hybrid immunity (rVE, 38% [95% CI, 27%-47%]). These protective gains were significant from 0 to 6 months but not 6 to 12 months after vaccination and during pre-XBB and XBB variant eras. Findings were similar for in-hospital severe illness. CONCLUSIONS: In cohorts with vaccine-derived and hybrid immunity, modest but significant gains in protection against hospitalization and severe COVID-19 illness were conferred by the annual variant-targeted booster dose but not sustained beyond 6 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious Diseases→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→