Integrated spatial morpho-transcriptomics predicts functional traits in pancreatic cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyses of patient-derived cell lines have greatly enhanced discovery of molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets. However, characterization of cellular morphological properties is limited. We studied cell morphologies of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines and their associations with drug sensitivity, gene expression, and functional properties. By integrating live cell and spatial mRNA imaging, we identified KRAS inhibitor-induced morphological changes specific for drug-resistant cells that correlated with gene expression changes. We then categorized a large panel of patient-derived PDAC cell lines into morphological (e.g., polygonal, irregular, spheroid) and organizational (e.g., tightly aggregated, multilayered, dispersed) subtypes and found differences in gene expression, therapeutic targeting potential, and metastatic proclivity. In human PDAC tissues, we identified prognostic expression signatures associated with distinct cancer cell organization patterns. In summary, we highlight the potential of cell morphological information in rapid, cost-effective assays to aid precision oncology efforts leveraging patient-derived in vitro models and tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".