Widespread decoupling of spindles and slow waves in temporal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Memory impairment is common in people with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Recent studies in healthy subjects showed a positive correlation between sleep spindles coupled to slow waves (SWs) and memory performance. We aimed to determine differences in spindle-SW coupling in TLE patients compared to healthy controls using combined high-density electroencephalography and polysomnography. METHODS: The study population consisted of 20 patients (12 female, 36.5 ± 9.9 years old) with unilateral drug-resistant TLE (10 left temporal) and 20 age- and sex-matched controls (12 female, 31.2 ± 6.3 years old). Spindles (10-16 Hz, .5-3 s) and SWs (.5-4 Hz) were automatically detected during all N2 and N3 epochs using validated detectors. Coupling of spindles with SWs was defined as overlap between both detected events. RESULTS: Coupled spindle-SW rates (per minute) were globally reduced in patients with TLE compared to healthy controls (median = .18 [interquartile range (IQR) = .08-.36] vs. .35 [IQR = .24-.46], p = .014, d = -.46). This reduction was also found for coupled fast spindle (12-16 Hz)-SW (.06 [IQR = .02-.13] vs. .18 [IQR = .07-.25], p = .013, d = -.46) and slow spindle (10-12 Hz)-SW rates (.11 [IQR = .04-.23] vs. .19 [IQR = .13-.27], p = .034, d = -.40). Within TLE patients, there was no local difference between the coupling rates in the lobe with the epileptic focus compared to the contralateral side (.09 [IQR = .02-.13] vs. .07 [IQR = .02-.13], p = .18). The effect size of the reduction was stronger in early than late sleep for both N2 and N3 sleep (early N2 d = -.50 vs. late N2 d = -.39; early N3 d = -.53 vs. late N3 d = -.47). SIGNIFICANCE: Despite a focal epileptic generator, patients with unilateral TLE showed a widespread decoupling between sleep spindles and SWs that was most prominent in early sleep. As coupling was shown to be associated with neuropsychological performance in healthy people, this global decoupling may constitute one potential mechanism of poor memory performance in people with TLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".