MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408474701 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-9517

Subglacial bedload export quantification and subglacial drainage network evolution inferred using environmental seismology techniques

2025· preprint· en· W4408474701 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Mancini, Michael Dietze, Matthew Jenkin, Tom Müller, Floreana Miesen, Matteo Roncoroni, Stuart N. Lane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDrainage networkBed loadSeismologyGeomorphologyCartographyGeographyDrainage basinSedimentSediment transport

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alpine glaciers have been retreating at increasing rates in recent decades due to climate warming. As a consequence, large amounts of suspended and bedload flux are exported from subglacial channels to proglacial environments, such as proglacial forefields. To date, our understanding of subglacial sediment export by subglacial streams has been predominantly shaped by suspended sediment dynamics recorded in front of shrinking glaciers, primarily due to difficulties in measuring bedload transport. Bedload transport is typically monitored far downstream from glacier termini at permanent monitoring stations (e.g. water intakes), leaving significant uncertainties regarding the absolute quantities and temporal patterns of transport in both glacial and proglacial environments, as well as its relative importance compared to suspended sediment in the context of proglacial morphodynamic filtering. Recent advancements in environmental seismology have addressed this knowledge gap. Given this, the aim of this project was to develop a novel technique for calibrating the Fluvial Model Inversion (FMI) model of Dietze et al. (2019) to quantify, for the first time, the total subglacial bedload export from an Alpine glacier and to investigate the physical mechanisms driving it.This work focuses on a large Alpine glacier, the Glacier d’Otemma, located in the Southwestern Swiss Alps (Canton Valais). Continuous seismic data were collected in close proximity to the glacier terminus using a DATA-CUBE type 2 datalogger connected to a three-component PE-6/B geophone, over two entire melt seasons (June to September 2020 and 2021) experiencing different climatic conditions: the first year was warm and relatively dry, while the second was cold and relatively wet.The seismic ground parameter values of the FMI model used to invert the raw seismic data into bedload transport were determined by adopting a Monte Carlo simulation based on a Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) approach. This involved iteratively running thousands of inversions within predefined ranges of possible ground seismic parameter values. The methodology was validated by comparing parameter values and model outputs to those obtained using a more conventional active seismic survey.Results indicate that the developed methodology for calibrating the inversion model is promising and comparable to those derived from the more demanding active seismic survey technique. Scientifically, findings reveal a strong agreement between subglacial bedload export rates and the snowline altitude during the melt season. Extremely warm summers are associated with the exhaustion of subglacial bedload sources as the progressive rise of the snowline altitude fully exposes the glacier's bare ice, while cooler summers show the opposite pattern. This highlights the existence of a link between atmospheric temperature, subglacial drainage network extension, and bedload output rates. These results are crucial for advancing our understanding of the relationship between subglacial sediment export and meteorological conditions in a warming climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→